They introduced copula for pricing of CDO,and discussed how different CDO spreads were with using different copula for pricing.
I would like to reproduce their result (especially,P23-Table7)
The condition of calculation is following that
number of debt(NUM.REFDEBT):=100
maturity(MATURITY):=5 year
recovery rate(RECOVERY.RATE):=40%(constant value)
probability of default (DEFAULT.PROBABILITY):=5%(in 5 years)
parameter of nomal copula ρ:=0.15
parameter of clayton copula α:=0.21
They apporoximated their valuation formula for easy calculation(equation (27))
(They assumed that CDO spread were paid as discounted bond at the begging.)
I simulated valuation of CDO with their method.
The result is following that
copula/tranche
Equity
mezzanine
senior
super senior
normal
1,145.42
62.49
0.52
0.000
t(20)
1,055.28
86.07
2.18
0.004
t(6)
896.74
126.44
8.56
0.044
t(3)
733.31
165.90
23.56
0.191
clayton
857.64
135.73
12.83
0.084
This table reproduce their result(P23-Table7).
And, In senior or super senior,you can understand that the CDO spread which is evaluated by normal copula is lower than the others. It means that normal copula is inadequate in financial crisis.
I show you my programming code(by R language).
If you copy and run my source code, you can duplicate my result easily. Before you run, please install "copula"package.